Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hardlinked pristine trees

[Pau Aliagas]

On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Tom Lord wrote:

> 
>     > From: Pau Aliagas <address@hidden>
> 
>     > If Tom would enlighten me on how to do away without pristine trees, I'd 
> do 
>     > my best to farewell them. It sounds better than losing time in 
> hardlinking 
>     > them, if possible.
> 
> Have a look at `src/tla/libarch/local-cache.[hc]'.
> 
> The vague problem statement is to implement the functions declared in
> the .h in such a way that they "work well".

At a first glimpse and applying logic, if we want to get rid of pristine 
trees, we have to make the revision library mandatory.

Is that an issue? I don't think so, we could even have a default path for
it if not supplied, so that the user shouldn't have to type it the first
time.

Pau