Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Design proposal to kill pristine trees

[Tom Lord]

    > From: Miles Bader <address@hidden>

    > On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 03:39:31PM -0700, Tom Lord wrote:
    > >    A fixed path for revision libraries is fine.   It should 
    > >    _not_ have a mechanism for invoking a script to compute the path.
    > >    Miles' requirements can be satisfied in cleaner ways.

    > Which are?  As described so far, a fixed path is certainly _not_ 
sufficient.

Yes it is.   Please spare me from thread archaeology and explain again
why you think otherwise.

    > [I have this sinking feeling that the answer's going to be something like
    > `Buy a bigger disk!  Buy a faster computer!']

Never a bad idea when it's an option, but no, that's not the intent.

-t