[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla-pqm 0.2
From: |
Colin Walters |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla-pqm 0.2 |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Oct 2003 12:08:50 -0400 |
On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 11:26, Tom Lord wrote:
> > From: Colin Walters <address@hidden>
>
> > Second, submit-merge could be based on some metainformation stored in an
> > archive.
>
> Yeah, I'm not too fond of that. At least it should be finer
> granularity that that.
Well, yeah. I agree my proposal needs more thought. Your other emails
on the subject are very good, I'm going to reply to them soon.
> Which is a really interesting idea if we can figure out what it means
> but it also suggests that it really doesn't belong in tla itself.
Right...although it kind of depends on what you mean by "in tla itself".
I think we'd like for arch to be easily amenable to dealing with the
varied metadata that people want to associate with their software.
> Tla is just doing the basic revision control stuff (ideally) -- what
> you're talking about is a new thing that's layered:
>
>
> | |
> | new thing |
> ---------------------------------------------------
> | | | | |
> | tla | bug tracker | test framework | smtp | (etc.)
Yep. But again I think that in order to write "new thing", we will
likely want some changes in tla.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- [Gnu-arch-users] tla-pqm 0.2, Colin Walters, 2003/10/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla-pqm 0.2, Colin Walters, 2003/10/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla-pqm 0.2, Tom Lord, 2003/10/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla-pqm 0.2, Colin Walters, 2003/10/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla-pqm 0.2, Miles Bader, 2003/10/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla-pqm 0.2, Colin Walters, 2003/10/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla-pqm 0.2, Paul Hedderly, 2003/10/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla-pqm 0.2, Tom Lord, 2003/10/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla-pqm 0.2,
Colin Walters <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla-pqm 0.2, Tom Lord, 2003/10/17
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: bugs-closing (was: tla-pqm 0.2), zander, 2003/10/17
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla-pqm 0.2, Pau Aliagas, 2003/10/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla-pqm 0.2, Tom Lord, 2003/10/17
- [Gnu-arch-users] Extension language, Mark A. Flacy, 2003/10/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Extension language, Colin Walters, 2003/10/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Extension language, David Brown, 2003/10/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Extension language, Colin Walters, 2003/10/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Extension language, Tom Lord, 2003/10/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Extension language, Colin Walters, 2003/10/17