[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] more recent changes in address@hidden/tla--mainline
From: |
Robert Collins |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] more recent changes in address@hidden/tla--mainline--1.1 |
Date: |
Mon, 20 Oct 2003 07:00:37 +1000 |
On Mon, 2003-10-20 at 01:42, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-10-19 at 10:29, Robert Collins wrote:
> > On Sun, 2003-10-19 at 05:49, Colin Walters wrote:
> > >
> > > In general, default to being less strict about inventory classification.
> > > Untagged source is now treated as backup by default. tree-lint is
> > > less strict about untagged source (so you can import/commit).
> >
> > Wouldn't precious be a better untagged-source default than backup ?
>
> I don't know. Would it? Why do you think so?
# The primary categories are:
#
# category: copy locally? safe to clobber? archive?
#
# junk no yes no
# backup no no no
# precious yes no no
lets see: untagged-source backup won't preserve in tree untagged source
during tree copying operations, but won't clobber it either.
untagged-source precious will preserve untagged source in the tree
during tree copying operations. precious will emulate CVS's behaviour
for untagged source files - backup doesn't.
Rob
--
GPG key available at: <http://members.aardvark.net.au/lifeless/keys.txt>.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part