[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch and linux 2.7

From: Paul Hedderly
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch and linux 2.7
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 10:29:38 +0000
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 03:13:06AM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> What do I (really X 1) mean?  A libel suit.  Naming Miles and Paul as
> defendents.  The statements are public, defamatory, and not self-
> evidently true.  With that much ambiguity, the guy who already has a

Woooaaa... all I said was:

    > That is not allowed. It appears that you can't even contribute           
    > to a distribution that _contains_ another SCM...                         

I proclaimed one fact, and then stated an observation on implications of
the 'public' license for people involved in projects such as Debian (ie
as a Debian Developer, I may not be allowed to use BK since Debian
distribute 'competing' SCMs.) I can't see how I said anything defamatory,
or untrue.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]