Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: kernel.bkbits.net off the air

[Florian Weimer]

Samium Gromoff wrote:

> I think we should have a better choice than the lossy bk->cvs.

A direct gateway would be lossy as well.  Furthermore, tla is not yet
able to compete directly with BK.  Claiming that we are ready will
almost certainly result in a PR desaster.

Don't get me wrong, tla is fine for most projects which lack a central
repository, but the kernel is just too large and too active.