[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] OT: Lisp
From: |
Robin Farine |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] OT: Lisp |
Date: |
20 Nov 2003 22:00:19 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
>>>>> Samuel A Falvo writes:
> I'm pretty sure you just can't get more object oriented than
> Smalltalk. :)
In this domain, Self is(*) not bad at all, it even gets rid of
Smalltalk's cyclic inheritance trick.
And I had a lot of fun playing with Morphic!
Robin
(*) or was? the project seems completely dead now
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] OT: Lisp, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] OT: Lisp, Andrew Suffield, 2003/11/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] OT: Lisp, Charles Duffy, 2003/11/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] OT: Lisp, Andrew Suffield, 2003/11/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] OT: Lisp, Joshua Haberman, 2003/11/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] OT: Lisp, Ollivier Robert, 2003/11/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] OT: Lisp, Samuel A. Falvo II, 2003/11/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] OT: Lisp,
Robin Farine <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] OT: Lisp, Andrew Suffield, 2003/11/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] OT: Lisp, Joshua Haberman, 2003/11/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] OT: Lisp, Andrew Suffield, 2003/11/19
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: OT: Lisp, Miles Bader, 2003/11/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] is there demand for itla?, Andrew Suffield, 2003/11/20
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: is there demand for itla?, Miles Bader, 2003/11/20
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: is there demand for itla?, Andrew Suffield, 2003/11/20
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: is there demand for itla?, Miles Bader, 2003/11/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: is there demand for itla?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/11/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: is there demand for itla?, Bruce Stephens, 2003/11/20