[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: patch-log sizes
From: |
Dustin Sallings |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: patch-log sizes |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Dec 2003 00:44:51 -0800 |
On Dec 17, 2003, at 0:26, Pau Aliagas wrote:
Isn't all this soved by cacherev?
You have 1000 log entries in a project. You tag another branch and
cacherev base-0. You don't need the old patches anymore. so you can
"retire" the old archive.
That's kind of what I'm asking. I seem to recall reading a while back
that cacherev should take care of ``almost'' everything, but I never
found out what that meant. Is it just the inability to check out older
revisions (or is that possible)?
--
SPY My girlfriend asked me which one I like better.
pub 1024/3CAE01D5 1994/11/03 Dustin Sallings <address@hidden>
| Key fingerprint = 87 02 57 08 02 D0 DA D6 C8 0F 3E 65 51 98 D8 BE
L_______________________ I hope the answer won't upset her. ____________
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: patch-log sizes, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: patch-log sizes, Tom Lord, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: patch-log sizes, Tupshin Harper, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: patch-log sizes, Tom Lord, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: patch-log sizes, Miles Bader, 2003/12/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: patch-log sizes, Tom Lord, 2003/12/17
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] patch-log sizes, Dustin Sallings, 2003/12/16
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] patch-log sizes, Marco Zühlke, 2003/12/19
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] patch-log sizes, Andrew Suffield, 2003/12/17