[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch review - am I accurate?
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch review - am I accurate? |
Date: |
Sun, 7 Mar 2004 18:21:03 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 05:42:16PM +0000, David A. Wheeler wrote:
> Manual control over caching, and controlling various performance
> parameters, are useful. But by default, arch should take advantage
> of the information it has available to it, and do the "right thing"
> automatically to give reasonable performance.
If you can come up with an algorithm that actually does this, feel free to
suggest it (i.e., show the code, slightly paraphrased).
-Miles
--
`The suburb is an obsolete and contradictory form of human settlement'
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Caching (was: GNU Arch review - am I accurate?), (continued)
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch review - am I accurate?, Charles Duffy, 2004/03/08
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch review - am I accurate?, David MENTRE, 2004/03/10
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch review - am I accurate?, David A. Wheeler, 2004/03/07
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch review - am I accurate?, David A. Wheeler, 2004/03/09
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GNU Arch review - am I accurate?, Miles Bader, 2004/03/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch review - am I accurate?, Jan Hudec, 2004/03/11
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GNU Arch review - am I accurate?, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/12
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GNU Arch review - am I accurate?, Miles Bader, 2004/03/13
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GNU Arch review - am I accurate?, Jan Hudec, 2004/03/13
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GNU Arch review - am I accurate?, Miles Bader, 2004/03/12
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GNU Arch review - am I accurate?, Jani Monoses, 2004/03/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GNU Arch review - am I accurate?, Tom Lord, 2004/03/13