[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla on nfs only

From: Sri Ramkrishna
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla on nfs only
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 07:05:28 -0800 (PST)

No worries. :-)  I have nothing in production anyways at the moment.  :-)


On Sun, 14 Mar 2004, Tom Lord wrote:

> Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 19:29:58 -0800 (PST)
> From: Tom Lord <address@hidden>
> To: address@hidden
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla on nfs only
>     > From: Charles Duffy <address@hidden>
>     > On Sun, 2004-03-14 at 12:31, Sri Ramkrishna wrote:
>     > > I will certainly use any tla thats NFS friendly.  I work in a large 
>     > > corporate environment where everything is NFS (or some other global 
>     > > filesystem like AFS).
>     > AFS works quite a bit more nicely than NFS, FWIW.
> I second that but......
> Sri: keep your eyes on the 1.3preX series over the next month or
> three.  The NFS issue is relatively recent (we had a damn good NFS
> track record until I blew it merging and tweaking "inode signatures"
> -- I operated on the false assumption that dev and ino numbers were
> constant when the inode signature stuff came along) -- the fixes are
> known -- it's (blush) on my plate to fix ---- it's in the pipeline.
> Muddle through as you can for now.  Feel free to contact me about
> consulting to bump the priority (and, in so doing, advance arch
> generally).  Either way -- it won't be all that long.  Sorry for the
> temporary annoyance.
> -t

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]