[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Gnu-arch-users] Re: grokking arch

From: Miles Bader
Subject: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: grokking arch
Date: 25 Mar 2004 11:20:23 +0900

Robin Green <address@hidden> writes:
> How can Bitmover restrict you from talking about alternatives to Bitkeeper
> *internally*?

Well who knows what they will and/or can (legally) do, but I've
certainly gotten the impressions from L-M's ravings on the lkml that he
would like to do such things, or at least that he wants people to
_think_ he would.

I've gotten very little sense of a coherent _policy_ behind BK
licensing, more like if L-M likes you get a license, otherwise ...
"No BK for you!"

"Whatever you do will be insignificant, but it is very important that
 you do it."  Mahatma Gandhi

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]