[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Public Arch servers

From: Robin Green
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Public Arch servers
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 03:42:22 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.4i

On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 12:46:46AM +0000, Julian T. J. Midgley wrote:
> In article <address@hidden>,
> Robin Green  <address@hidden> wrote:
> > is another possibility (which also happens to run
> >the savannah code). They claim to admin the server "democratically"
> >in accordance with a constitution, which seems cool. (As opposed to
> >savannah which has been dysfunctional for weeks and weeks, leaving
> >over 300 project registrations to pile up - very uncool.)
> Not that the fact that an entity is run democratically in accordance
> with a constitution necessarily precludes the uncool piling up of
> other things allegedly under said entity's control, of course.
> q.v. Debian's new-maintainers fiasco of a year or two back, the USA's
> nuclear arsenal, UK trains (quite literally on occasion), the M25...

Yes, that was a rather bizarre juxtaposition, wasn't it? I had intended
to explain myself more fully, but I rushed it off without thinking.

Attachment: pgpJM_3Zd1laz.pgp
Description: PGP signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]