|
From: | Aaron Bentley |
Subject: | Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Mixing star-merge and selective replay |
Date: | Fri, 16 Apr 2004 13:24:23 -0400 |
User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040309) |
Julian T. J. Midgley wrote:
In article <address@hidden>, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> wrote:So it turns out that there isn't a solution to the original problem - you can't mix selective replays (the effect of which is to omit certain patches) and star-merge.Well, of course you can. The problem you're having has to do with using star-merge between two branches *in both directions*. And if you think about it, it doesn't have to do with star-merge as much as with the notion of "propagate all changes from either branch to the other".
The problem (which is not a problem with star-merge itself) is that star merge /calculates/ a patch to apply, rather than just picking missing patches:
You're both right. The nature of star-merge is that it copies all changes. If you don't want that, you don't want star-merge.
Aaron -- Aaron Bentley Director of Technology Panometrics, Inc.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |