gnu-arch-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: missing & star-merge


From: Stig Brautaset
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: missing & star-merge
Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 11:51:37 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

On May 05 2004, Robert wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-05-05 at 19:26, Stig Brautaset wrote:
> > On May 05 2004, Jani wrote:
> > > I don't know in what case --new and --skip-present behave differently in
> > > replay.
> > 
> > My guess is that --new only applies the patches that are newer than the
> > last patch in the current tree. So, if you've cherry-picked patch-17 but
> > are missing patches 12-16 & 18-23, --new will replay only 18-23, but
> > --skip-present will replay all missing patches.
> 
> skip-present and new should (I haven't checked :}) be orthogonal.

Of course! My bad. What I really sketched out is (my guess at) the
difference between bare replay and replay with the --new flag.

> i.e. if the above example is extend - say patch-20 is a merge from you, 
> replay will replay 12-16,18-23
> replay --skip-present will do 12-16,18-19,21-23
> replay --new will do 18-23
> replay --new --skip-present will do 18-19,21-23

Yeah, I know that. Dunno what caused my confusion above...

Stig
-- 
brautaset.org




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]