[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [REJECT: address@hidden (default naming convention
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [REJECT: address@hidden (default naming convention changes)
Wed, 5 May 2004 15:27:53 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Matthieu Moy <address@hidden>
> Tom Lord <address@hidden> writes:
> > > From: Matthieu Moy <address@hidden>
> > > Tom Lord <address@hidden> writes:
> > > > 2) .o, .a, .so, .core, and .so* do not belong in junk.
> > > > Those files can be very, very valuable _and_ difficult or
> > > > impossible to reproduce. "junk", meanwhile, is comprised
> > > > that may be casually deleted.
> > > Then, shouldn't they belong to "precious" instead of
> > No. "Precious" implies that the files should be _copied_ whenever we
> > make a copy of "the good stuff" from a tree. Those files are
> > definately not (by default) in that category.
> I can understand that, but why should they be "unrecognized" ? I don't
> understand why having an object file in my tree should prevent me from
And I can understand that. That's a good reason to move them to
"backup" (not archived, not casually deleted, not copied with "the
good stuff" in a tree). The requested merge moved them to precious
(not archived, not casually deleted, copied with "the good stuff").
That's actually (to rehearse something that comes up every couple of
months on the list) not a bad way to understand inventory categories:
There are three binary flags:
copied with "the good stuff?"
which initially suggests eight categories but then we realize that
half of those categories are nonsense.
archived? deleted? copied? =
no no no backup
no no yes precious
no yes no junk
no yes yes nonsense
yes no no nonsense
yes no yes source
yes yes no nonsense
yes yes yes nonsense
"unrecognized" is everything not on that map.
"excluded" is something orthogonal to the five basic categories.
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [REJECT: address@hidden (default naming convention changes), Colin Walters, 2004/05/05