[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [REJECT: address@hidden (default naming convention
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [REJECT: address@hidden (default naming convention changes)
Wed, 05 May 2004 16:31:37 -0400
On Wed, 2004-05-05 at 15:27, Tom Lord wrote:
> 1) .rej is in the same conceptual class as .orig, .original,
> .modified, and .reject --- they should all be handled the same way.
> 2) .o, .a, .so, .core, and .so* do not belong in junk.
> Those files can be very, very valuable _and_ difficult or
> impossible to reproduce. "junk", meanwhile, is comprised of files
> that may be casually deleted.
Well, I can see the argument for core not being junk. The others should
be easily reproducible in almost all cases. Anyways, what do you
> 3) .rej does not belong in unrecognized.
Perhaps the best way would be a fifth class, "merge-reject" or
something. tla could refuse to commit if any of these files exist,
perhaps overridable via an option.
Or maybe we could do it with a precommit hook. But then it would be
sort of painful to override when necessary.
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [REJECT: address@hidden (default naming convention changes),
Colin Walters <=