[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Avoiding ancestor scan during get with revision

From: Aaron Bentley
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Avoiding ancestor scan during get with revision library
Date: Sun, 09 May 2004 22:29:16 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4

Miles Bader wrote:

On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 06:10:11PM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:

Something that would be quite valuable in this would be non-volatile
ancestry data in the tree.  Patchlogs are almost right (and I've got
tools that use 'em), but since patchlogs can be removed (e.g. by replay
--reverse, or by your good self), we can't rely on them in every case.

Huh?  That's what patch-logs are for, isn't it?
If the user dicks around with it, it's his problem.

Yeah, and let's add the compress-patch-log stuff to remove some the
temptation to delete them...

Compressing the patchlogs will remove the info I need. (I need the "Continuation-of:" header)

Unless you mean something other than what's previously been discussed.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]