gnu-arch-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Gnu-arch-users] Why do "tla get-changeset" and "tla changes" have a dif


From: Matthieu Moy
Subject: [Gnu-arch-users] Why do "tla get-changeset" and "tla changes" have a different format?
Date: Sun, 16 May 2004 23:14:20 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux)

Hi,

I just wondered why the commands "tla get-changeset" and "tla changes"
had a diffent output format :

$ tla changes --diffs | head                                                   
* looking for address@hidden/xtla--main--0.1--patch-145 to compare with 
* comparing to address@hidden/xtla--main--0.1--patch-145
A  {arch}/xtla/xtla--jet/xtla--jet--0.0/address@hidden/patch-log/patch-69 
A  {arch}/xtla/xtla--jet/xtla--jet--0.0/address@hidden/patch-log/patch-70 
A  {arch}/xtla/xtla--jet/xtla--jet--0.0/address@hidden/patch-log/patch-71
A  {arch}/xtla/xtla--jet/xtla--jet--0.0/address@hidden/patch-log/patch-72
A  {arch}/xtla/xtla--jet/xtla--jet--0.0/address@hidden/patch-log/patch-73
A  {arch}/xtla/xtla--jet/xtla--jet--0.0/address@hidden/patch-log/patch-74
M  xtla.el
M  docs/HACKING
$ tla changes --keep --output ,,changes
[...]
$ tla show-changeset ,,changes/                                                
* added files

    {arch}/xtla/xtla--jet/xtla--jet--0.0/address@hidden/patch-log/patch-69
    {arch}/xtla/xtla--jet/xtla--jet--0.0/address@hidden/patch-log/patch-70
    {arch}/xtla/xtla--jet/xtla--jet--0.0/address@hidden/patch-log/patch-71
    {arch}/xtla/xtla--jet/xtla--jet--0.0/address@hidden/patch-log/patch-72
    {arch}/xtla/xtla--jet/xtla--jet--0.0/address@hidden/patch-log/patch-73
    {arch}/xtla/xtla--jet/xtla--jet--0.0/address@hidden/patch-log/patch-74

* modified files

    docs/HACKING
    docs/TODO
    xtla.el

$ _

I'm surprised because this means that

* There is  a duplication of  code inside tla.  Two ways to  display a
  changeset.

* This forces front-ends to duplicate parsing code also.

Any remarks on that ?

--
Matthieu




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]