[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] feature plan -- downstream branches
From: |
James Blackwell |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] feature plan -- downstream branches |
Date: |
Tue, 25 May 2004 13:01:45 -0400 |
Tom Lord:
> The ':' character should be permitted in branch names but
> have a slightly special meaning.
Tom Lord again:
> For example:
>
> branch name immediate upstream name
>
> tla--devo:selected-commit--1.3 tla--devo--1.3
>
What happens to branchless versions, e.g. smallproject--1.0 ?
Does that get turned into smallproject--:subbranch--1.3 ?
--
James Blackwell Try something fun: For the next 24 hours, give
Smile more! each person you meet a compliment!
GnuPG (ID 06357400) AAE4 8C76 58DA 5902 761D 247A 8A55 DA73 0635 7400
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] feature plan -- downstream branches, (continued)
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] feature plan -- downstream branches, Tom Lord, 2004/05/25
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] feature plan -- downstream branches, Tom Lord, 2004/05/25
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] feature plan -- downstream branches, Mikhael Goikhman, 2004/05/25
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] feature plan -- downstream branches,
James Blackwell <=
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] feature plan -- downstream branches, Bug Goo, 2004/05/27