Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: FEATURE PLANS: pruning instead of configs

[Jan-Benedict Glaw]

On Wed, 2004-05-26 10:48:50 +0900, Miles Bader <address@hidden>
wrote in message <address@hidden>:
> Tom Lord <address@hidden> writes:
> > Of the proposed features, things like "merge request headers" come the
> > closest to being itla material vs. tla core.   Perhaps the core could
> > have just some lower-level hooks and the behavior of `tla commit
> > --announce' could be pushed up to itla level.
> 
> I must admit, the idea of tla sending email sounds a bit over the top...

*spare-time linux kernel hacker hat on*

        I do like the idea. Sending patches by email is a common task,
        and it would even be superb if tla could pass proper message IDs
        along so that *-patch-nnn would result in a proper thread:)

*hat off*

MfG, JBG

-- 
   Jan-Benedict Glaw       address@hidden    . +49-172-7608481
   "Eine Freie Meinung in  einem Freien Kopf    | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg
    fuer einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger" | im Internet! |   im Irak!
   ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TCPA));

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature