gnu-arch-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] microbranches: prism-merge vs multi-merge


From: Andrew Suffield
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] microbranches: prism-merge vs multi-merge
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 22:47:42 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6i

On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 05:20:01PM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > Another use for the idea of "forking microbranches to make new
> > microbranches" is catching up after your upstream moves to a 
> > new branch.
> 
> One way to do that would be to have a command like
> 
>     % tla commit --base address@hidden/toto--titi--3.4
> 
> which would do the same as
> 
>     % tla commit
> 
> except that the new revision would be a continuation of
> address@hidden/toto--titi--3.4.

How ironic. This command is also known as:

larch commit --continuation

Anybody who remembers that far back will probably be mildly amused.

-- 
  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' :  http://www.debian.org/ |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]