[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: bug goo meta-data

From: Andrew Suffield
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: bug goo meta-data
Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 11:01:01 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6i

On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 05:18:12PM -0700, Tom Lord wrote:
> By convention, the version variable
>    set-version-var: bug-goo "FQ-VSN"
> pointing to the bug database for that version.  By default, the email
> address part of FQ-VSN is presumed to be the email address of the
> non-control bug goo mail robot, that email address with "-control"
> inserted before the "@" the control channel.
> Perhaps
>    set-version-var bug-goo ("FQ-VSN" 
>                             [:email ["ADDR0" | '()]]
>                             [:control [ "ADDR1" | '()])
> to override the default email presumptions.
> Perhaps also there should be a URL in there for the HTTP interface.

FWIW, there is essentially no reason why only one address should
capture non-control mail, and if any of the various ideas about
mailing list-driven category subscriptions get implemented, probably
*all* of them will work. It doesn't actually care where mail comes

The current archive is address@hidden;
address@hidden is the "human contact" address.

The HTTP interface is actually self-contained within the archive; any
old copy of the tree will work, if you point apache at it (although
obviously you'll be looking at an outdated revision sometimes, but
this probably wouldn't matter).

  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' : |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]