Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues

[Andrew Suffield]

On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 01:11:39PM -0400, Milan Cvetkovic wrote:
> >>>>>>Categories, branches, and versions are not orthogonal at all and add
> >>>>>>unnecessary complexity. Future features cannot differentiate between
> >>>>>>them because they are used very inconsistently in existing archives.

> >>>>No, they are not just the names.
> >>>>
> >>>>Version must consist of digits and dots only.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Relevance? To almost every tool, it's just a string that gets passed
> >>>through.
> >>
> >>They are not orthogonal. It is important to me - a human.
> >
> >
> >Relevance to *anything*?
> 
> Yes. I want version to be the project version rather than branch 
> version. It would be usefull to me - a human. And it is relevant to me.
> Most Arch archives look too disorganized because of this.

Sounds pretty irrelevant to me.

-- 
  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' :  http://www.debian.org/ |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature