[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline
From: |
Andrew Suffield |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline] |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Jun 2004 18:20:37 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i |
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 10:15:30AM -0700, Tom Lord wrote:
> I'd be worried that committers will be frustrated by the lag time
> between when the commit and when what they've committed appears in
> mainline. For example, it would mean I couldn't say to you, on the
> phone from far away, "Oh, I have something for that that's been
> tested. Lemme go ahead and check it in and then call you back in 15
> mintues after you check it out." Instead it would be "Oh I have
> something for that .... I'll check it in and call you back tomorrow
> after archive-side testing completes."
Oh, do think about it; you tell them you committed it to your own
branch :P
[Otherwise yes, running tests between every pair of revisions is
stupid and wrong and useless - can we stop talking about it now
please? :P]
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Colin Walters, 2004/06/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Tom Lord, 2004/06/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Colin Walters, 2004/06/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Tom Lord, 2004/06/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Robert Collins, 2004/06/26
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Tom Lord, 2004/06/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Colin Walters, 2004/06/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Tom Lord, 2004/06/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Jan Hudec, 2004/06/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Tom Lord, 2004/06/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline],
Andrew Suffield <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Tom Lord, 2004/06/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], James Blackwell, 2004/06/23
[Gnu-arch-users] round 2 of GCC v. Arch, Tom Lord, 2004/06/23
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Colin Walters, 2004/06/23
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Tobias C. Rittweiler, 2004/06/23
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Colin Walters, 2004/06/23
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Tobias C. Rittweiler, 2004/06/23
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Aaron Bentley, 2004/06/23
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Andrew Suffield, 2004/06/23
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Stephen J. Turnbull, 2004/06/23