gnu-arch-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[BUG] Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Mirror limit oddity


From: Tom Lord
Subject: [BUG] Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Mirror limit oddity
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 11:28:32 -0700 (PDT)

(yes, that's a bug.)

    > Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 09:49:46 -0400
    > From: Aaron Bentley <address@hidden>
    > User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040309)
    > X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
    > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
    > X-Panometrics-MailScanner: Found to be clean
    > X-BeenThere: address@hidden
    > X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4
    > Precedence: list
    > List-Id: a discussion list for all things arch-ish 
<gnu-arch-users.gnu.org>
    > List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users>,
    >   <mailto:address@hidden>
    > List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/gnu-arch-users>
    > List-Post: <mailto:address@hidden>
    > List-Help: <mailto:address@hidden>
    > List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users>,
    >   <mailto:address@hidden>
    > Sender: address@hidden
    > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63-42mail_2004060101 (2004-01-11) 
on 
    >   mail.42inc.com
    > X-Spam-DCC: sgs_public_dcc_server: mail 1199; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1
    > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=4.5 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 
autolearn=ham 
    >   version=2.63-42mail_2004060101
    > X-42email-MailScanner-Information: Please contact 
http://www.42inc.com/support.html for more information.
    > X-42email-MailScanner: Found to be clean
    > X-UIDL: 9fab0c2b5aca891878991ede387113d2
    > 
    > 
    > I have two packages with similar names:
    > pyaba--0 & pyaba--dist--0
    > 
    > When I do archive mirror with a limit of "pyaba--0", both are mirrored:
    > 
    > * mirroring address@hidden to 
    > address@hidden with limit pyaba--0
    > ** adding revision pyaba--0--patch-122
    > ** adding revision pyaba--dist--0--patch-52
    > 
    > Is this the expected behavior?  I thought that pyaba--0 meant 
    > "category==pyaba, no branch, version==0", not "category==pyaba, 
    > version==0".  I don't really see the second form being useful, but I've 
    > been wrong before.
    > 
    > Aaron
    > 
    > -- 
    > Aaron Bentley
    > Director of Technology
    > Panometrics, Inc.
    > 
    > 
    > _______________________________________________
    > Gnu-arch-users mailing list
    > address@hidden
    > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users
    > 
    > GNU arch home page:
    > http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
    > 
    > 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]