Re: [Gnu-arch-users] (tla--devo--1.3--patch-28) fix for revlibs vs. NFS

[Andrew Suffield]

On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 09:44:39AM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 03:13:20PM -0700, Tom Lord wrote:
> > Revision: tla--devo--1.3--patch-28
> > Archive: address@hidden
> > Creator: Tom Lord <address@hidden>
> > Date: Fri Jun 25 15:13:12 PDT 2004
> > Standard-date: 2004-06-25 22:13:12 GMT
> > Modified-files: ChangeLog libarch/inode-sig.c
> > New-patches: address@hidden/tla--devo--1.3--patch-28
> > Summary: [NOTE] fix for revlibs vs. NFS
> > Keywords: 
> > 
> 
> Okay, I just noticed this is (obviously) a valid pseudo-header, which
> fits in too neatly to miss. A couple of trivial relaxations for
> unknown fields means it's now valid for [COMMIT] messages.
> 
> So, you just stuff Bug: and Merge: fields into the log header, and
> 
> tla cat-archive-log $ARCH_ARCHIVE/$ARCH_REVISION | mail -s "[COMMIT] 
> $ARCH_ARCHIVE/$ARCH_REVISION" address@hidden

<sigh>

tla cat-archive-log $ARCH_ARCHIVE/$ARCH_REVISION | mail -s "[COMMIT: 
$ARCH_ARCHIVE/$ARCH_REVISION]" address@hidden

[COMMIT] takes an argument. One of these days I'll remember that the
first time.

-- 
  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' :  http://www.debian.org/ |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature