[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: patches missing files -> conflict?
|
From: |
Colin Walters |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: patches missing files -> conflict? |
|
Date: |
Mon, 05 Jul 2004 23:36:24 -0400 |
On Tue, 2004-07-06 at 12:26 +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> Colin Walters <address@hidden> writes:
> >> No, I like that behaviour - it allows fork-and trim followed by merges.
> >
> > What is fork-and trim?
>
> I think he means forking a branch, and then removing most of the files.
This seems like a good use case for a merge option (--ignore-missing) or
something, than as an argument for always ignoring patches missing
files.
GNU patch has barfed on missing files forever, it seems to me changesets
should be the same way.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part