[Gnu-arch-users] The C-B-V-R part of a fully qualified name

gnu-arch-users

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Gnu-arch-users] The C-B-V-R part of a fully qualified name

From:	Matthew Dempsky
Subject:	[Gnu-arch-users] The C-B-V-R part of a fully qualified name
Date:	07 Jul 2004 21:54:06 -0500
User-agent:	Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3

One of the xtla developers was asking in #arch about what the best
name for the category--branch--version--revision part of a fully
qualified name (archive/c-b-v-r).  I recommended "fully qualified
revision" or "non-fully qualified name", but I thought I'd ping the
mailing list.

-jivera

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

[Gnu-arch-users] The C-B-V-R part of a fully qualified name, Matthew Dempsky <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] The C-B-V-R part of a fully qualified name, James Blackwell, 2004/07/08
  - Re: [Gnu-arch-users] The C-B-V-R part of a fully qualified name, Johannes Berg, 2004/07/08
    - Re: [Gnu-arch-users] The C-B-V-R part of a fully qualified name, James Blackwell, 2004/07/08
  - Re: [Gnu-arch-users] The C-B-V-R part of a fully qualified name, Andrew Suffield, 2004/07/08

Prev by Date: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch Roadmap Draft (the anticipated part 3)
Next by Date: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to")
Previous by thread: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline]
Next by thread: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] The C-B-V-R part of a fully qualified name
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread