Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: commit --tagging

[Tom Lord]

    > From: Aaron Bentley <address@hidden>

    > Tom Lord wrote:

    > > It should behave analogously to `tag'.

    > Okay, will do.  And -S, I guess.

    > One difference between commit and tag is that commit always has access 
    > to logs.  I think tla commit --base $(logs -f $VERSION|tail -n) is more 
    > useful than tla commit --base $(revisions -f $VERSION|tail -n), but 
    > whatever.

Hmm.  Well, actually, I think you're strongly right: that's _much_
better.  I hadn't thought of that possibility.

(But, yeah, -S to, sure.)

-t