[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Intended behaviour when updating?

From: Aaron Bentley
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Intended behaviour when updating?
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 09:05:54 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040309)

Dirk Kuypers wrote:
because the directory they have been in was new. Is this a bug? Or is it
intended behaviour and it is my fault to not add the files before

Ach. That's painful. It partly depends on what you have set for untagged-source. If untagged-source is junk, then tla's behavour is legitimate. If untagged-source is source, then it should have committed it anyway. If untagged-source is unrecognized, it should have refused to do anything until you added the files and directory.

It seems changeset application isn't quite right here; tla should never delete a directory that contains backup or precious files.


Aaron Bentley
Director of Technology
Panometrics, Inc.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]