Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla on win32

[Jim Lynch]

Hi Lode and *,

I had some questions...

First (to Lode only), did you know tla-1.2.1 was released this month?
It's available at...

    http://release.gnuarch.org/tla-1.2/1.2.1/

Second, I was interested in getting your tla version from a tla, so
I was wondering if you'd provide the physical location of the archive
you're using to track its development? Mirror or http: is fine; I'm
not interested in writing to it.

On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 09:06:55 +0200 (CEST)
address@hidden wrote:

> Tom,
> 
> what is the current future for tla on win32?
> 
> After you requested a summary of the status of the various
> efforts, I've seen some replies about who-is-doing-what,
> but we haven't heard anything from you on the list...
> 
> could you shed some light on what your opinion is
> about tla on win32?

I'm not Tom of course, but iirc, tla was never designed/meant to build
on non-posix systems. (Whether that's an advantage or disadvantage is up
to the reader :) So the question you're asking really boils down to
"Does Tom want to maintain a version of tla meant to add compatibility
with win32?" which is a question I can't field. But I would ask, what's
wrong with using cygwin?

> thanks.
> 
> -- lode
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Plaats je zoekertjes GRATIS op AdValvas
> Placez votre petite annonce GRATUITEMENT sur AdValvas
> http://www.advalvas.be
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gnu-arch-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users
> 
> GNU arch home page:
> http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
> 


-Jim

--
Jam sessions community web site: http://jam.sessionsnet.org