[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: gnuarch 1.2.1 released! (reannouncement)
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: gnuarch 1.2.1 released! (reannouncement) |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Aug 2004 12:26:26 -0700 (PDT) |
> From: address@hidden (James Blackwell)
> Grin. I've mentioned it a couple times on list, but after the apparent
> nobody but jblack tested rc1 problem, I figured repeating things
> ad-frigging-infintum would make more sense. :)
In my experience: yes, lots of gentle repetition is the only way to
spread a meme from arch-central to the larger community.
>> *ALL* patches should go through BugGoo. You, jblack, should be
>> working off of buggoo.
> I'm not using it directly, though I did hit some of the merge requests
> for the last cycle.
> Regarding closing bugs, I'm utterly clueless. ;)
Ugh. Please consider working on fixing that, although I guess it's
kind of a race between you fixing your process here and asuffield
finishing automating it.
The goal here should obviously be that you're helping the project
evolve past the need for a Tom-bottleneck, not that you're just taking
over the Tom-bottleneck role. Every step, therefore, I hope you'll
think in terms of automation and, in that light, using Bug Goo as the
official order-form for your integration labor seems to me to be a big
positive step.
> > Jblack: I'd be in favor of a PQM-ish policy that *all* changes must
> > have an associated buggoo issue which includes a merge request for the
> > changes. Would you be willing to require that?
> I figured it would be best to wait for the real PQM to come
> around;
Your call. As GNU maintainer, if asuffield stalls, I should revist
this in less than 6m.
> in
> the mean time, I'm more than happy to scrape off the mergelist and
> respond to friendly emails.
Your call. I'd be stingier with my attention, if I were you.
Asking for people to go through buggoo is not a big imposition on them
and it will leave you with, if nothing else, an incredible journal of
your integration work.
> > > command deltions/archive incompatible changes are in limbo right
now. If
> > > furth comes along "soon", then send those to Tom. If furth takes
"a long
> > > time", then I'll open up a 1.3 development window, and we'll lump
all of
> > > those patches together, and do a 1.3rc1.
> >
> > I appreciate your conservatism in such matters.
> >
> > The voting system would be a win here. Really, there should be a list
> > of "topics" and if a proposed change here overlaps with one of those
> > topics (e.g., an archive format change) then it should get a "Flag"
> > vote which blocks it from integration without
> > more-serious-than-average review.
>
> I'm excited about the voting system.
Aren't we all. I wish we could collectively hire asuffield to work
on it full time :-)
-t
- [Gnu-arch-users] gnuarch 1.2.1 released! (reannouncement), (continued)
- [Gnu-arch-users] gnuarch 1.2.1 released! (reannouncement), James Blackwell, 2004/08/15
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: gnuarch 1.2.1 released! (reannouncement), Miles Bader, 2004/08/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: gnuarch 1.2.1 released! (reannouncement), Aaron Bentley, 2004/08/15
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: gnuarch 1.2.1 released! (reannouncement), Miles Bader, 2004/08/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: gnuarch 1.2.1 released! (reannouncement), Aaron Bentley, 2004/08/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: gnuarch 1.2.1 released! (reannouncement), James Blackwell, 2004/08/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: gnuarch 1.2.1 released! (reannouncement), Tom Lord, 2004/08/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: gnuarch 1.2.1 released! (reannouncement), James Blackwell, 2004/08/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: gnuarch 1.2.1 released! (reannouncement), Tom Lord, 2004/08/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: gnuarch 1.2.1 released! (reannouncement), James Blackwell, 2004/08/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: gnuarch 1.2.1 released! (reannouncement),
Tom Lord <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: gnuarch 1.2.1 released! (reannouncement), Andrew Suffield, 2004/08/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: gnuarch 1.2.1 released! (reannouncement), Andrew Suffield, 2004/08/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: gnuarch 1.2.1 released! (reannouncement), Tom Lord, 2004/08/17
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: gnuarch 1.2.1 released! (reannouncement), Miles Bader, 2004/08/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: gnuarch 1.2.1 released! (reannouncement), Tom Lord, 2004/08/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: gnuarch 1.2.1 released! (reannouncement), Tom Lord, 2004/08/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: gnuarch 1.2.1 released! (reannouncement), Marc Recht, 2004/08/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: gnuarch 1.2.1 released! (reannouncement), Tom Lord, 2004/08/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: gnuarch 1.2.1 released! (reannouncement), Marc Recht, 2004/08/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: gnuarch 1.2.1 released! (reannouncement), Tom Lord, 2004/08/16