Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Conflicts in .arch-ids

[Tom Lord]

    > From: Aaron Bentley <address@hidden>

    > One clean-room approach would be for an Archer to specify the API they 
    > needed, and for a BK-clean user to write a library conforming to that API.

    > The API would not, then, be Arch-specific, and in fact, could also be 
    > the basis for BK -> svn, BK -> darcs, and BK -> perforce gateways.

    > I'm not necessarily recommending this approach, but one of the cscvs 
    > maintainers could probably spec up a good API.

Nice analysis, btw.

You don't necessarily recommend but I outright dis-recommend that
approach.  Screw bitkeeper.  Leapfrog it.  Don't waste your time on
it.  Let it be COBOL.

-t