[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the state of the union
From: |
Daniel Stone |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the state of the union |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Aug 2004 16:00:41 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040803i |
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 05:53:32PM -0500, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
> Daniel Stone <address@hidden> writes:
> > Because that doesn't account for any of the edits I've done in my build
> > directory because I didn't really bother to hit up cp -al?
>
> How are you doing out of tree builds? Do you have something like:
>
> wd/ -- working directory
> wd/foo -- source tree for Foo 3.14
> wd/foo-build -- directory where foo is built
Usually I just have:
wd/ -- working directory
wd/foo -- source tree for Foo 3.14, directory where foo
is built
> where foo is either autotooled or uses package-framework?
While most of my stuff is autotooled, I don't always use out-of-tree
builds (on some source trees, that's impossible without solving some
very difficult issues I'd rather not tackle right now) on them, and some
source trees aren't autotooled at all.
> What kind of edits are you making to your build directory that need to
> be saved in arch that shouldn't instead be in your source directory?
None. The fact tla forces (not even suggests -- per default, forces) me
to do this annoys me slightly. I'm sure it will eventually train me into
better habits, but I don't think this is tla's place, personally. I just
find it akin to having tla sleep and lock the screen for 3min every 45
and tell me to take a break so my RSI doesn't get worse.
--
Daniel Stone <address@hidden>
"The programs are documented fully by _The Rise and Fall of a Fooish Bar_,
available by the Info system." -- debian/manpage.sgml.ex, dh_make template
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the state of the union, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the state of the union, Andrew Suffield, 2004/08/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the state of the union, Tobias C. Rittweiler, 2004/08/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the state of the union, Daniel Stone, 2004/08/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the state of the union, Miles Bader, 2004/08/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the state of the union, Daniel Stone, 2004/08/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the state of the union, Charles Duffy, 2004/08/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the state of the union, Matthew Dempsky, 2004/08/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the state of the union, Daniel Stone, 2004/08/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the state of the union, Matthew Dempsky, 2004/08/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the state of the union,
Daniel Stone <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the state of the union, Aaron Bentley, 2004/08/25
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the state of the union, Stefan Monnier, 2004/08/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the state of the union, Miles Bader, 2004/08/25
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the state of the union, Tom Lord, 2004/08/26
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the state of the union, Juliusz Chroboczek, 2004/08/28