[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Gnu-arch-users] Re: [ATTENTION PLEASE] standards process

From: Nikolai Weibull
Subject: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [ATTENTION PLEASE] standards process
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 20:58:51 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6i

* Andrew Suffield <address@hidden> [Sep 02, 2004 20:40]:
> > I do not propose to implement it literally but, can I get some
> > (quick, not prolonged) feedback on the idea of adopting the general
> > idea of:
> >
> >
> >
> > as the procedure for managing Arch standards documents?

Sounds great.  It would be much easier to keep track of what a
discussion regarding some possible enhancement to Arch actually amounts
to, rather than going through incredible lengthy threads on the mailing
list.  A standard format for these documents would also greatly enhance
their usefulness.

> Call things by their real names please; the word is "specification".

Gotta agree with you here.

> There are two definitions of "standard":

Actually, there are eleven definitions according to WordNet 2.0, see
but I shouldn't be such a bastard.

::: name: Nikolai Weibull    :: aliases: pcp / lone-star / aka :::
::: born: Chicago, IL USA    :: loc atm: Gothenburg, Sweden    :::
::: page:  :: fun atm: gf,lps,ruby,lisp,war3 :::

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]