[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: s/GMT/UTC/
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: s/GMT/UTC/ |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Sep 2004 10:18:48 +0900 |
Jeremy Shaw <address@hidden> writes:
> Some people feel that the current time stamps are nearly worthless and
> should be removed altogether. I think this is a bit extreme, but it
> would prevent someone from mistakenly believing the timestamps can be
> trusted to any degree. (And it would 'fix' one of the rfc2822
> incompatabilities).
Note that the header name is "Date:", not "Precision-Timestamp:", and is
of course very useful as such -- think "hmmm, this shit was comin' down
in late september, what changesets are there from around then?".
[Did somebody really suggest this header is "nearly worthless and should
be removed altogether"? Have they actually ever used arch?!?]
-Miles
--
"I distrust a research person who is always obviously busy on a task."
--Robert Frosch, VP, GM Research
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] s/GMT/UTC/, (continued)
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] s/GMT/UTC/, Jan Hudec, 2004/09/07
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] s/GMT/UTC/, Jeremy Shaw, 2004/09/07
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] s/GMT/UTC/, Jan Hudec, 2004/09/07
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: s/GMT/UTC/,
Miles Bader <=
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: s/GMT/UTC/, Jeremy Shaw, 2004/09/09
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: s/GMT/UTC/, Tom Lord, 2004/09/09
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: s/GMT/UTC/, Adrian Irving-Beer, 2004/09/09
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: s/GMT/UTC/, Matthieu Moy, 2004/09/09
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: s/GMT/UTC/, Phil Frost, 2004/09/09
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: s/GMT/UTC/, Miles Bader, 2004/09/09
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: s/GMT/UTC/, David Allouche, 2004/09/10
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: s/GMT/UTC/, Zenaan Harkness, 2004/09/10
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: s/GMT/UTC/, Adrian Irving-Beer, 2004/09/10