[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [MERGE REQUEST] A couple of trivial cosmetic change

From: David Allouche
Subject: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [MERGE REQUEST] A couple of trivial cosmetic changes
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 00:37:04 +0200

On Thu, 2004-09-09 at 18:16 -0400, Miles Bader wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 10:38:15AM -0400, Aaron Bentley wrote:
> > I think the problem is the way it conveys the information, not the 
> > information itself.  It's occasionally helpful, and you agree it's not 
> > harmful, so I think a better fix would be to say "(no limit specified)"
> I disagree -- no limit is the default, and "normal" behavior; there's no need
> to add random verbiage saying `you haven't specified any unusual options!'
> Just get rid of the ` limit (null)' and I'll be happy.

I agree with Miles on that one.

I guess the "occasional usefulness" refers to debugging scenarios. If
you want debugging output, you can print the mirror limit from the
driver. No need to clutter the common case output.

                                                            -- ddaa

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]