[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: bitkeeper vs tla
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: bitkeeper vs tla |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Sep 2004 13:54:10 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
> Main problem seems to be that inode-signature support is currently a bit
> spotty (e.g., updates don't update them, last time I check, explicit id
> checks don't take advantage of them, etc).
Indeed, in my experience, tla's performance is pretty bad for the following
reasons:
- inode-signatures are only updated upon commit.
- checking the revlib's consistency doubles the number of stat calls.
(ironically, the revlib checking is mostly due to the fear of corruption
with --link stuff. I don't want to use (and can't anyway) --link so I've
disabld revlib checking). Disabling revlib checking makes `tla
file-diffs' instantaneous (instead of taking several seconds), as it
should be.
- most importantly: (almost) all operations apply to the whole tree.
So even if you work in a small subdirectory of a dozen files, all
operations will take time proportional to the thousands of files in
your project.
Stefan
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Link with permissions, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Link with permissions, Robin Farine, 2004/09/29
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Link with permissions, Zenaan Harkness, 2004/09/29
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Link with permissions, tomas, 2004/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Link with permissions, Robin Farine, 2004/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Link with permissions, tomas, 2004/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Link with permissions, Robin Farine, 2004/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Link with permissions, Zenaan Harkness, 2004/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Link with permissions, Robin Farine, 2004/09/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: bitkeeper vs tla, Aaron Bentley, 2004/09/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: bitkeeper vs tla, Miles Bader, 2004/09/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: bitkeeper vs tla,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: bitkeeper vs tla, Milan Cvetkovic, 2004/09/24