[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to l
From: |
Adrian Irving-Beer |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Sep 2004 00:03:26 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040818i |
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 12:43:24AM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> Obey the damned headers, especially when they're triply-redundant.
> People who don't bother to state a preference don't much matter.
I fully agree. I actually like getting direct e-mails as well as list
e-mails. I remember that month where it could take hours or days for
some posts to show up on the list.
If I ever change my mind, you won't hear about it, but your mail
client (if it's half decent) will, and should Do The Right Thing.
Please let it do its job.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, Miles Bader, 2004/09/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, James Blackwell, 2004/09/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, Matthieu Moy, 2004/09/27
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, Nikolai Weibull, 2004/09/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, James Blackwell, 2004/09/27
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, Miles Bader, 2004/09/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list, Andrew Suffield, 2004/09/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "reply all" etiquette: reply-all vs. reply'ing to list,
Adrian Irving-Beer <=