Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] i18n (Re: Message translation - basic framework)

[Robert Collins]

On Sun, 2004-12-05 at 07:01 +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-08-19 at 11:44 +0900, Tez Kamihira wrote:
> > A few days ago, some french translator asked me about i18n status of
> > GNU arch. Because my previous request went somewhere far away, I
> > re-send it to BUG GOO.
> > 
> > On the logical ground, my attempt woundn't be complicated at all, but
> > it triggers fairly amount of lines in tla's code, so it's almost
> > impossible for me to make another long lived tracking branch from
> > tom/jblack's main line and maintain it independently for a long time.
> 
> Hi, I've looked at this and its not (currently) suitable for inclusion.
> 
> It places po data for tla into package-framework, which is wrong :
> package-framework is a separate project (think autoconf) to tla.
> 
> The correct way is to put common logic, but not data into
> package-framework, and the tla specific data & logic into tla itself.
> 
> I'm going to see if I can hack something up based on your work though.

I've integrated your code into baz:
address@hidden/package-framework--i18n--1.1
address@hidden/bazaar--devel--1.1--patch-18
address@hidden/bazaar-debian--i18n--1.1

I'll be pushing this into the mainline shortly. 

Anyone who wants to do translations : they'd be massively appreciated.

Cheers,
Rob

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part