[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Archive configuration recommendations
From: |
Matthieu MOY |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: Archive configuration recommendations |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 11:30:35 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.1 |
Quoting Colin Fox <address@hidden>:
> What would the pros and cons be for mirroring vs tagging a single
> project?
Mirroring makes a read-only copy. Tagging creates a continuation on which you
can commit. They are two different operations with different purpose.
> If my subcontractors mirror, does that mean they mirror the
> whole archive, even if they're only working on one project within the
> archive? If that's the case, it seems like overkill.
You can limit the mirroring to a version.
> Ok, that makes sense. The only thing is -- I don't want to have to
> register an archive for each developer so I can get their changes back.
Registering an archive is one command line, and is done once for each archive.
Much simpler than sending a mail for each merge. Furthermore, some commands like
"tla missing" or "tla star-merge" won't be available if you don't have acces to
the archive.
--
Matthieu
-------------------------------------------------
envoyé via Webmail/IMAG !