[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Is a tagged revision independent of the source?
From: |
Rob Browning |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Is a tagged revision independent of the source? |
Date: |
Sun, 23 Jan 2005 11:52:46 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Matthew Dempsky <address@hidden> writes:
> Rob Browning <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Just to make sure I understand tag semantics, if I run "tla tag foo
>> bar" is bar independent of foo after that? In particular, if the
>> archive containing foo goes away, will bar and everything subsequent
>> to bar still function correctly?
>
> They're independant in the same sense that if you write a web site and
> include links to another web site, that yours will still function if
> the other becomes unavailable for whatever reason.
>
> You can always keep a mirror of the other archive if you're afraid
> that it becomes unavailable, or like was mentioned in another thread,
> use 'tla cacherev' on the tagged revision.
So if you have archive-1 and you tag from that into archive-2, and
then later archive-1 goes away, will someone who just wants to do a
"tla get" from archive-2 to get the latest code still be able to, or
will their get fail because it needs access to archive-1 for the
oldest revisions?
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Is a tagged revision independent of the source?,
Rob Browning <=