[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?

From: Matthieu Moy
Subject: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Future of GNU Arch, bazaar and bazaar-ng ... ?
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 10:02:49 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)

martin f krafft <address@hidden> writes:

> also sprach John A Meinel <address@hidden> [2005.08.23.1850 +0200]:
>> Method 3: Go to *everyone's* personal working directory, and make
>> sure that they have ~/.arch-params/hook setup correctly before
>> allowing them to commit to the main repository. Have them vow not
>> to mess anything up, on pain of being denied commit access.
> Imagine 100 users. Imagine the pain. I want in-archive hooks!

Then, why did you delete Method 1 and Method 2 ?

Think of pqm as a centralized archive with a smart server. It's just
not implemented in the same way (pqm is an extra layer, not in the
core protocol), but it offers roughly the same service.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]