[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] into the ether again: wd factor
From: |
Jeremy Shaw |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] into the ether again: wd factor |
Date: |
Tue, 1 Nov 2005 08:10:10 -0800 (PST) |
On Nov 01, 2005 05:35 AM, Robert Anderson <address@hidden>
wrote:
> I'll throw this one into the ether again:
> If there was a way to take a tree and split out changes hunk by hunk
> into two or more trees (including a null tree), wouldn't the power of
> changesets really finally be there in a way that's far more useful?
This is the default behaviour in darcs -- when you do 'darcs record',
it will iterate through each hunk, rename, etc, and ask if you want
to include it in the changeset. You can also do, 'darcs record -a',
to record everything.
Even if you are very careful about creating clean changesets, this is a
useful feature. For example, sometimes the build process will patch
files,
and you don't want to commit those changes. Running:
'make clean && tla commit && make'
Can take a very long time (hours) for something like x.org or OOo.
j.
- [Gnu-arch-users] into the ether again: wd factor, Robert Anderson, 2005/11/01
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] into the ether again: wd factor,
Jeremy Shaw <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] into the ether again: wd factor, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/11/01
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] into the ether again: wd factor, Karel Gardas, 2005/11/01
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] into the ether again: wd factor, Adrian Irving-Beer, 2005/11/01
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] into the ether again: wd factor, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/11/01
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] into the ether again: wd factor, Christopher Dale, 2005/11/01
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] into the ether again: wd factor, Adrian Irving-Beer, 2005/11/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] into the ether again: wd factor, Andy Tai, 2005/11/03
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: into the ether again: wd factor, Matthieu Moy, 2005/11/02
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] into the ether again: wd factor, Robert Anderson, 2005/11/01