[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Debian and package-framework
From: |
Sylvain Beucler |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Debian and package-framework |
Date: |
Mon, 15 May 2006 01:26:19 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 |
Hi Andy,
> ><troll-mode>
> >Can you tell me why package-framework ought to replace autoconf? Is
> >it still maintained? If not, wouldn't it be simpler to switch to
> >autoconf? :)
> ></troll-mode/>
>
> Putting aside the issue of which one is better, the current code of tla
> depends on package-framework and it is not worth the effort to make changes
> over this aspect.
This puzzles me actually: what part of tla depends on
package-framework? It uses it, sure, but is there something more? What
you say sounds like so.
--
Sylvain
- [Gnu-arch-users] Debian and package-framework, Sylvain Beucler, 2006/05/08
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Debian and package-framework, Andy Tai, 2006/05/08
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Debian and package-framework, Sylvain Beucler, 2006/05/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Debian and package-framework, Thomas Lord, 2006/05/09
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Debian and package-framework, Miles Bader, 2006/05/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Debian and package-framework, Ludovic Courtès, 2006/05/10
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Debian and package-framework, Thomas Lord, 2006/05/10
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Debian and package-framework, Miles Bader, 2006/05/10
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Debian and package-framework, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2006/05/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Debian and package-framework, Stefan Monnier, 2006/05/11
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Debian and package-framework, Thomas Lord, 2006/05/09