[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] GPLv2 or GPLv2+
|
From: |
Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray |
|
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] GPLv2 or GPLv2+ |
|
Date: |
Sun, 11 Nov 2007 01:27:33 +0530 |
Is GNU Arch (ie. tla-1.3.5) licensed under "GPL version 2 only" or
"GPL version 2 or (at your option) any later version" ? The Savannah
project page (http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch) mentions "GNU
General Public License v2 or later", while the src/COPYING file in the
1.3.5 release tarball mentions "...GNU General Public License, version
2,..."
This piece of information is essential for creating a tla Fedora package.
Happy hacking.
Debarshi
--
GPG key ID: 63D4A5A7
Key server: pgp.mit.edu
- [Gnu-arch-users] GPLv2 or GPLv2+,
Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/11/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray, 2007/11/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Ludovic Courtès, 2007/11/12
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/11/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Thomas Lord, 2007/11/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/11/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Miles Bader, 2007/11/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Thomas Lord, 2007/11/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/11/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+, Miles Bader, 2007/11/16