Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: GPLv2 or GPLv2+

[Alfred M. Szmidt]

    >     >     > You can create the Stephen J. Turnbull General Public
    >     >     > License that only contains the legal parts that just
    >     >     > happens to have the exact same terms as the GNU GPL.
    >     > 
    >     >    That is explicitly not permitted.
    >     > 
    >     > I never wrote `modify the GNU GPL', I wrote `the exact same
    >     > terms'.
    > 
    >    That's right, you didn't write "modify".  However, under the law
    >    what you describe would be considered modification.
    > 
    > No, it would not, ideas cannot be copyrighted.

   OK.  Show us how to do it.  For bonus points, get it certified as a
   Free Software license by the FSF.

http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html

What did I win?