[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [GNU-linux-libre] [Dev] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version fo

From: Luke
Subject: Re: [GNU-linux-libre] [Dev] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 19:54:14 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101, Thunderbird/38.5.1

On 06/09/2016 07:46 PM, André Silva wrote:
> On 06/09/2016 08:08 PM, Riley Baird wrote:
>>> Yes, you're right in that point, however Parabola is maintaining a good
>>> relationship with FSF, GNU project and Richard Stallman too and they
>>> insist we use 'Arch GNU/Linux' instead.
>>> In some words, if we put in the Social Contract 'Arch Linux', we will
>>> maintain a good relationship with Arch guys, if we put 'Arch GNU/Linux',
>>> we will maintain a good relationship with FSF, GNU project and Richard
>>> Stallman. What should we use? good question and big problem.
>> What about "Arch (the GNU/Linux distribution)"?
> +1 I agree with your suggestion because it solves this issue for the
> Social Contract.
If FSF and Arch Team is ok with calling it that, I think it is a good
That way people will know it is the GNU/Linux distro named Arch and
avoid the entire naming controversy to begin with.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]