[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [GNU-linux-libre] [Dev] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version fo

From: Luke Shumaker
Subject: Re: [GNU-linux-libre] [Dev] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 09:39:36 -0400
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue) FLIM/1.14.9 (Gojō) APEL/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/24.5 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)

On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 03:34:24 -0400,
coadde wrote:
> On 06/10/2016 12:59 AM, Luke Shumaker wrote:
> > Would you be happy (not feel disrespected) if we were to write the
> > following?
> Why are you saying "we"? it is your opinion, not me. You can not speak
> on behalf of Parabola devs.

"we" the people involved in the Social Contract.  What opinion?  I was
asking if RMS thought it would be a suitable way to word item 4.  If
everyone liked it, /we/ would write it.  It was in a
hypothetical--there was no implied consensus yet.

~ Luke

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]