[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [GNU-linux-libre] [Dev] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version fo

From: coadde
Subject: Re: [GNU-linux-libre] [Dev] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 19:22:10 -0300

On 06/13/2016 06:40 PM, coadde wrote:
> On 06/13/2016 05:33 PM, Richard Stallman wrote:
>> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
>> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
>> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
>> The invariant sections in manuals under the GFDL are not part
>> of the documentation.  They are works of opinion.  That's what
>> makes them ethically legitimate, in our view.  The documenation is
>> free, but has to be accompanied with the statement of political
>> views that support the free software movement.
>> It is self-defeating for an activity of the free software movement
>> to adopt rules against making sure its views reach the public.
> I think you mean about it:
> "with the exceptions of: non-modifiable license texts, works under the
> GNU Free Documentation License with invariant sections, and works of
> opinion."
> Maybe the below example could solve it, eg:
> with the exceptions of: works of opinion licenses like CC by-ND.[0][1]
> [0]:
> [1]:

There are some references about free culture licenses that could be
useful for us:

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]